The financial world is no stranger to controversy and scandals, but recent headlines have cast a harsh light on the underside of the cryptocurrency world. As hack-and-slash stories capture the masses’ attention, it’s easy to overlook the misdeeds of more established financial players.
Here we take a closer look at the corruption of old banks and compare it to the plights of the crypto industry. Too often, cryptocurrency critics ignore the massive failures of traditional institutions.
Turning the spotlight
Recently, the financial world has seen many cyber breaches and thefts, and cryptocurrencies are often in the spotlight. However, digging deeper into the issue reveals that traditional banks, such as Wells Fargo, deserve some of the blame.
Notably, Wells Fargo has incurred a staggering $7 billion in fines since 2020, while the crypto sector has lost $6.45 billion due to hacks and rug withdrawals. One might argue that comparing one bank to the entire crypto sector is unfair. Keep in mind, however, that Wells Fargo is a prime example of the failures of the old banking system, and its malpractices reflect a broader trend within the industry.
Meanwhile, other legacy banks such as JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank faced heavy fines. These and other banks have been convicted or settled on a series of charges. These include money laundering, fraud and selling Toxic stock to defraud investors.
Irregularities at Legacy Banks
The fines imposed on Wells Fargo cover a wide range of issues, including whistleblower retaliation, discrimination, consumer protection violations, fraud, and anti-money laundering violations. This indicates that the problems within legacy financial institutions are deeply rooted and are not limited to the cryptocurrency space.
For example, in 2016 Wells Fargo faced a $185 million fine for opening more than 1.5 million unauthorized bank accounts and issuing more than 500,000 unauthorized credit cards. JPMorgan Chase, another leading bank, faced a $920 million fine in 2020 for manipulating the precious metals and treasury markets.
A history of illegality
While cryptocurrencies have come under intense scrutiny, the world’s largest banks have been silent detonator fines for their misconduct.
American bank, the largest group, faced 214 fines, totaling $82.7 billion. Some notable examples include a $16.65 billion settlement in 2014 for misleading investors about the quality of mortgage-backed securities, and an $11.8 billion settlement in 2012 over abusive foreclosure practices. c. B. Morgan ChaseAnother US banking giant incurred 158 fines amounting to $35.7 billion.
In 2020, the bank was fined $920 million for manipulating precious metals and treasury markets. Another $13 billion fine came in 2013 for misleading investors during the housing crisis.
Wait, there’s more
- Citigroup He faced 122 fines, cumulatively worth $25.4 billion. These include a $7 billion settlement in 2014 for misrepresenting the quality of mortgage-backed securities, and a $1.25 billion fine in 2015 for its role in foreign exchange market manipulation.
- Wells Fargo has accumulated, as previously mentioned, 181 fines worth $21.3 billion. Infamous examples include the $185 million fine in 2016 for opening unauthorized bank accounts, and the more than $2 billion fine in 2018 for issuing mortgages containing incorrect income information.
- Deutsche Bank, Germany’s largest bank, incurred 59 fines totaling $18.1 billion. The bank was fined $7.2 billion in 2017 for its role in the US subprime mortgage crisis and fined $2.5 billion in 2015 for its involvement in manipulating the benchmark LIBOR rate. Deutsche Bank also paid fraud and money fines laundry.
- Swiss bank UPS He faced 83 fines amounting to $16.7 billion. Some notable examples include a $1.5 billion fine in 2012 for manipulating LIBOR and a $5.1 billion fine in 2015 for misleading investors over mortgage-backed securities.
- All told, Goldman Sachs imposed 44 fines, totaling $16.3 billion. Notable examples include a $5.1 billion settlement in 2016 over the sale of toxic mortgage-backed securities and a $2.9 billion fine in 2020 for involvement in 1MDB scandal. The US Department of Justice accused Goldman Sachs ConspiracyFraud, bribery and tampering with witnesses.
The staggering numbers reveal significant illegitimacy in the big banks, which is indicative of the misconduct of the financial sector. Despite the criticism of cryptocurrencies, the regulated giants are not infallible and cause more economic harm.
Separate facts from fiction
While cryptocurrencies have been associated with hacks and other illicit activities, it is important to separate reality from hype. Many cryptocurrency hacks have resulted from poor security measures on the part of individual users or exchanges. rather than the weaknesses inherent in the technology itself.
- Additionally, the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies provides greater transparency and accountability. Facilitate tracking and recovery of stolen funds in some cases.
- Banks give false guarantees with low returns fractional reserves. People now see risks and rewards in managing cryptocurrency finances.
- the 2008 The global financial crisis exposed banking vulnerabilities and mistrust. Bitcoin appeared next in 2009, and it is a decentralized currency that bypasses central banks and governments.
Despite the negative sentiment surrounding cryptocurrencies, a corrupt global financial system – backed by governments and central banks – is the real culprit. These entities have caused more economic disruptions and death, Devastation, and further curb personal freedom than the entire crypto sector combined. Why? Because they have more power than most governments.
Given the mounting evidence against traditional banks, it is critical that society reassess its trust in these institutions. This includes recognizing the potential benefits of digital currencies. As well as understanding the risks and benefits of this emerging financial technology.
Embrace digital currencies
Embracing this new technology can help people take back financial control and get rid of the shackles of old banks.
Cryptocurrencies offer the advantage of intermediary-free transactions, allowing for faster and cost-effective transfers. This benefits remittances, as people can send money globally with minimal fees and without traditional bank delays.
Another advantage is the potential for financial inclusion, as cryptocurrencies can provide access to financial services for the unbanked. With a smartphone and internet connection, anyone can participate in the global economy. Regardless of location or credit history.
While cryptocurrencies offer many benefits, it is necessary to strike a balance between innovation and regulation. Regulatory frameworks must be designed to protect consumers and prevent illegal activities. such as money laundering and terrorist financing. But without stifling the growth and adoption of digital currencies.
Some countries, such as Switzerland And Singapore, has already taken steps to build a supportive environment for cryptocurrency businesses. Promote innovation while ensuring consumer protection and financial stability.
A new era of transparency and inclusion
Digital currencies Confront negative feelings. But the old financial institutions deserve more scrutiny than they got. With the support of governments and central banks, these organizations have done far more damage to the global economy than cryptocurrencies have.
The adoption of digital currencies enables a fairer and more transparent financial system free from the shackles of the past. The technology’s potential benefits, such as increased financial inclusion and lower transaction costs, can outweigh the risks, with responsible management.
As we move forward, the balance between innovation and regulation will be critical in shaping the future of finance. By fostering an environment that encourages the responsible adoption of digital currencies, we can pave the way for a more inclusive and transparent global financial system.
Following the Trust Project’s guidelines, this featured article features opinions and perspectives from industry or individual experts. BeInCrypto is dedicated to transparent reporting, but the opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of BeInCrypto or its employees. Readers should verify information independently and consult with a professional before making decisions based on this content.